International Military Packaging Design Development and Countermeasures (3)

International Military Packaging Design Development and Countermeasures (3)

Foreign Military Packaging Strengthening Management

1. Establish packaging management mechanism

The packaging of foreign military equipment has established a series of effective management mechanisms from top to bottom. For example, the US military’s weapons packaging is a four-level management function system. At the highest level, the Assistant Secretary of Defense appointed the designated person to be responsible for the packaging work, to determine, formulate, and modify the relevant packaging policy directives; the second level was the instructions of the Army's Equipment Command to implement the Assistant Secretary of Defense, and specifically contracted for the implementation of the packaging organization plan; The rank is the “Packaging, Storage, and Containerization Center” of the Army Command. It is the central organization for the US military’s materials and packaging work. According to the superior’s policies and directives, it combines various kinds of packaging work with the actual situation of the troops and often sends experts to the military. Warehouses (including overseas garrison bases) inspect packaging problems and collect and report back package information. The fourth level is related agencies that are distributed around the country, that is, management departments responsible for packaging work, mainly military warehouses. The United Kingdom, France and Germany also have corresponding packaging management agencies to avoid repeated packaging.

2. Establish full-time staff

In order to make sure that the weaponry and equipment packaging work is truly implemented and form a situation where the top and the bottom work together, the United States, Britain, France, and Germany (including the Marine Corps) have set up packing staff to cooperate with the full-time packaging engineer and represent the department’s responsibility. Develop military packaging work. For example, the U.S. Army Equipment Command and its subordinate warehouse system commands, which manages all Army warehouses, have set up full-time packaging staff. Most of the Army's weapons and equipment packages are carried out here. In addition, the Air Force System Command, the Air Force Equipment Command, the Navy Supply System Command, and the Marine Corps all set up their own packing staff and established a "Packaging" composed of all-armed and professional personnel led by the Air Force System Command. The “Joint Coordination Group” is responsible for coordinating the work of the land, sea, air force, and defense supply systems on packaging, and brings the opinions and suggestions of the various arms on packaging to the conference room for analysis and research, and solves all arms and military services in the same industry sector. Between the issues, the formulation of modified packaging standards and other work.

3. Guarantees for the packaging of weapons and equipment

In general, the cost of military packaging containers is high and the one-off investment is relatively large. However, the overall economic benefits of weapons and equipment systems are good. This not only saves a lot of long-term storage maintenance costs, back and forth handling fees, transportation costs, but more importantly, Weapons and equipment have been reliably protected and have obvious economic benefits. Therefore, foreign countries have fully guaranteed this. For example, the US military’s packaging costs are about 5% of national defense costs, the Japanese army is 4.7%, the Indian Army is 2.6%, and Western Europe is 3.4% to 4.6%. Eastern Europe is 2.4% to 3.1%. In general, the proportion of packaging scientific research expenses in developed countries is large, accounting for 15% to 22% of military packaging costs, while developing countries only account for 2% to 7%. An obvious feature of foreign military packaging is that military packaging occupies a certain proportion in the development and production of weapons, so as to ensure the quality of research and development of military packaging and smooth development. For example, the cost of British weapons and equipment equipment accounts for 5% to 8% of the total cost of weapon equipment; German packaging costs account for 5% to 10% of the total cost; US military packaging costs account for 5% to 10% of the total cost.

4. Implement green military packaging

In developed countries, military packaging works through the entire process from product development to use. This is the new green packaging concept. The US military believes that the packaging work should receive corresponding attention when it comes to the development of weapons and equipment. A series of standards have been formulated for designers' reference. For example MIL-STD-1367, MIL-STD-1319, FED-STD-102, these standards control the protective packaging requirements of weapons equipment macroscopically, they and several other major military standards, such as MIL-STD-794, FED The STD-101 packaging test method, the MIL-Ben-810 environmental test method, and the MIL-P-116 protective packaging method constitute a strict management system and a green balance for preventing pollution and protecting the global environment.

5. Formulate standards to ensure that the tender system for packaging

The military of the United States, Britain, France, and Germany attaches great importance to the standardization and standardization of military packaging. For example, the U.S. military uses technical documents such as packaging specifications and standards to organize the development and production of command products, and effectively control the competitive process of bidding and bidding. From the 1950s onwards, it gradually established its own uniform and uniform military packaging standards. Such as MIL-STD-1319 (influence of transportability and package handling equipment design features), MIL-STD-1367 (system/equipment packaging, handling, storage and transportation requirements), FED-STD-102 (storage protection inside and outside packaging Level) and other macro control standards and FED-STD-101 (packaging test methods), MIL-STD-116 (protective packaging methods), MIL-STD-794 (equipment and components inside and outside packaging), MIL-STD-810 (environment There are a large number of supporting documents for microscopic control standards, important standards, and specifications, which constitute a strict management system for the development, production, ordering, handling, storage, use, and management of macro and micro weapons and equipment. Make the packaging work in accordance with the regulations and laws, and enhance the operability and versatility. Then the military, ordering party and Cheng Zhifang.


(to be continued)

Children's Bouncing Cup


This is Lunar from Wuyi Xukai industry and Trade Co,Ltd.Our company is an industry and trade enterprise intergrating stainless steel products,daily plastic products,household appliances and other manufacturing, processing,sales ,goods import and export,technologgy import and export.The main products are stainless steel mugs,wine bottles,wine vessels,household plastic products,etc.We support ODM and ODM services.

As for the cola bottle you are interested in ,we do produce now.The price of material is rising in China,so if you are interested in this,you will make decisions as soon as possible,whether to choose us or another purchasers.And the Spring Festival is just over one month away,so let's know your decision asap.

Looking forward to your reply.

Sincerely
Lunar
Wuyi Xukai industry


bouncing cup with lid.kids bottle.stainless steel cup.mini bounce cover.

Wuyi Xukai industry and Trade Co.,Ltd , https://www.wyxukai.com